Case Results and Hallmark Achievements
Our results speak for themselves. In case after case, the attorneys at our Texas-based law firm have successfully helped clients resolve a wide range of complicated legal matters involving professional license defense, medical license defense, and vocational license defense. We know how to build a strong case to protect your license – and your livelihood. To read what some of our satisfied clients have to say about us, please visit our testimonials page.
Call TodayTexas Board of Nursing v. MS
Texas Board of Architectural Examiners v. MBL
Texas Department of Insurance v. TN
Texas Department of Insurance v. TT
Texas Medical Board v. OA
Texas Board of Nursing v. GA
Facts: Client received a complaint from BON after a patient reported that she failed to discuss severe blood test results leading to an emergency room visit. The patient alleged that after his results were issued, client never called him and he ended up having to report to the emergency room for several days due to low …
Texas Medical Board v. EM
Facts: Client hired firm after submitting an application for licensure. He received an investigative inquiry from TMB regarding his application and prior criminal convictions. Client was convicted of assault over 20 years ago and he did not fully disclose the conviction. Outcome: Firm submitted an amendment to client’s application and explained the conviction along with describing client’s …
Texas Board of Law Examiners v. OW
Facts: Client hired firm after BLE notified him that he did not have sufficient character and fitness to be barred in Texas. Specifically, BLE alleged that client did not amend his character and fitness application after he was arrested for felony possession with intent to distribute. Client admitted that he did not amend his application because …
Texas Board of Pharmacy v. ML
Texas Education Agency v. FC
Facts: Client hired firm after receiving a Notice of Investigation from TEA. TEA alleged that client had inappropriately touched several female students in his elementary class. Outcome: Firm attended an informal conference and argued that client did not commit the acts alleged. Firm provide argument and explanation that sometimes these students make up lies about teachers because …